Preventing Illness
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
The best healthcare is prevention 
Why new ideas are quickly dismissed by "experts" and non-experts alike without any logical analytical reasoning. This is why humanity misses out on often fantastic ideas in all fields of knowledge. Also, progress in many human endeavors is slower than it could be. Of course, the internet helps a great deal in the faster spreading of new ideas, but not with accepting new ideas. The thousands of bloggers that write about everything and nothing are "killing" a lot of very good ideas by jumping too quickly to conclusions. Their objective is also often to find fault with everything they attack with their blogging. Special interests have also hired bloggers to misinform the public with misinformation that the special interests pay them for to blog about.
The biggest problem with new ideas in any field of knowledge is that they are hardly ever taken seriously. An even bigger problem is when they are simple ideas or brilliantly simple ideas and sound too good to be true. The reasoning with which people quickly dismiss new ideas is that all new ideas follow the Pareto 80-20 rule in that 80% of all new ideas are most likely useless or bad ideas and only 20% are ranging from "GOOD" to "BRILLIANT". So people perform quick "triage" with a simple litmus test. They do some very sloppy quick reading of any new idea to get the gist of it. When they think that they have the gist of it and understand the idea somewhat they will not bother to do proper logical analytical thinking. Instead, they put their brain in top-gear to find fault with new ideas. They will quickly compare the new idea to what they "know" to be the "truth", fully ignoring the fact that new ideas must differ with the current believed in "truth" to be new ideas. The more new ideas differ from the current believed in "truth", the quicker they will dismiss them as not meriting more than the 20 seconds of the modern average attention span. As people get older, their tolerance for listening to new ideas becomes very limited and the quicker they will decide against any new ideas for reasons that they have suffered more of the 80% bad and even dangerous ideas. Their litmus test is, of course, the most illogical way to evaluate new ideas. New ideas would not be new ideas if they would not differ from current beliefs. Significant improvements over old ideas would make new ideas even more different and the more different ideas are the less likely they are accepted as the brilliant ideas they may be.
The following ideas presented here, if true, would make the health crisis in the United States a thing of the past with illness reduced to under 25% of what it is currently. So here you have it, right off the bet: "Too good to be true". So you just have to control yourself by not applying the usual illogical litmus test comparing it to what you currently believe to be the truth. So you should spend a bit more time and do som